Legal Opinion

Tracy Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 7, 2011No. 2100184PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PITTMAN, Judge.

This appeal presents a question regarding the proper application of the “common-fund” exception to the so-called “American rule,” which generally bars awards of attorney fees to prevailing parties, in the context of a dispute between an injured insured party and a subrogated insurance carrier over whether the carrier is responsible for a pro rata share of the insured’s attorney fees incurred in the process of obtaining a settlement payment against which the carrier has asserted a right of reimbursement. The common-fund exception as recognized in Alabama is derived from notions…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Ex Parte State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClintonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Blake v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
  2. Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  3. Perry v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PritchardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API