Tracy Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
PITTMAN, Judge.
This appeal presents a question regarding the proper application of the “common-fund” exception to the so-called “American rule,” which generally bars awards of attorney fees to prevailing parties, in the context of a dispute between an injured insured party and a subrogated insurance carrier over whether the carrier is responsible for a pro rata share of the insured’s attorney fees incurred in the process of obtaining a settlement payment against which the carrier has asserted a right of reimbursement. The common-fund exception as recognized in Alabama is derived from notions…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Ex Parte State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClintonOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- York Ins. Group of Maine v. Van HallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Blake v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2012
- Mitchell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Perry v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2014
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. PritchardCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015