Legal Opinion
Natalie Ortiz Torres v. Honorable Lawrence E. Walsh, United States District Judge, Application of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, for a Writ of Mandamus, or a Writ of Prohibition, or Both v. Hon. Archie O. Dawson, District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and Said United States District Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 13, 1955No. 23488Published
1Opinion of the Court
221 F.2d 319
Natalie Ortiz TORRES, Petitioner,
v.
Honorable Lawrence E. WALSH, United States District Judge,
Respondent.
Application of THE PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,
Petitioner, for a writ of mandamus, or a writ of
prohibition, or both,
v.
Hon. Archie O. DAWSON, District Judge of the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New
York and said United States District
Court, Respondents.
Docket Nos. 23472, 23488.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1955.
Decided April 13, 1955.
Golenbock & Komoroff, New York City (Donald S. Sherwood, New York City, of counsel), for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.