Legal Opinion

People v. Lemanuel C.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 2007No. S144515PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 1800 et seq. sets forth procedures that govern the extended detention of dangerous persons. Section 1800 originally provided, in part, that persons under the control of the Department of Youth Authority 2 could be civilly committed to its control at the time they would otherwise be discharged by statute if they “would be physically dangerous to the public because of [a] mental or physical deficiency, disorder, or abnormality.” (Stats. 2003, ch. 4, § 45.) In order to preserve the extended detention scheme’s constitutionality, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Cooley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. John L.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. Curlee CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Johnson, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. K.G. v. MeredithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API