Legal Opinion
Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 25, 1997No. 97-29CPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This bid protest case is presently before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on all counts of the complaint. Oral argument on Count I was heard on February 3, 1997. Oral argument on Counts II, III, and IV was heard on February 14, 1997. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiffs motion for summaiy judgment is denied and the Government’s motion for summary judgment is granted.
Background
On April 24, 1996, the United States Department of the Army (“Army”) formally issued Solicitation DAJA22-95-R-0083. The solicitation sought bids from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- John Reiner & Company, Individually and to the Use of Kurz & Root Company (Incorporated) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Total Medical Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- The United States v. Amdahl CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Graphicdata, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Al Ghanim Combined Group Co. Gen. Trad. & Cont. W.L.L. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Argencord Mach. & Equip., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Orion International Technologies v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- WinStar Communications, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.