Legal Opinion

Maloney v. Houston

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1921No. Civ. No. 3481PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendants. On September 6, 1918, defendants, who were in possession of two certain concessions at Seal-Beach, California, known ,as “Auto Parking Station” and “Tent City and Delicatessen Store,” of which they claimed to be the owners, entered into a written contract with plaintiff whereby, for the sum of $2,000, to be by him paid, they agreed to sell an undivided one-half interest in the property. Of the consideration so specified, $700 was paid by plaintiff at the time of the execution of the contract; and it was provided therein that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Bradford v. ParkhurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Urban v. YoakumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Tuft v. BrothersonUtah Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API