Legal Opinion

In Re Appropriation for Hwy. Purposes of Lands of Lunsford

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 1968No. 232PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

This is a case involving the appropriation by the'.state of Ohio for highway purposes of some fourteen lots, parts of three others, and part of a street in a platted subdivision. The subdivision had been platted and the plat recorded October 31, 1963; the streets therein had been dedicated but had not been accepted as county or township roads. The streets, however, have been laid out and graded with five or six inches of gravel. In the center of the plat was a lake reserved for recreational purposes, and this had been worked over and developed. Drainage tile had been installed.

One lot had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. In Re AppropriationOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Deercreek Local Board of Education v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henry v. Ballard & Cordell Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. Babinec v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. City of Hilliard v. First Industrial, L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Tacchino v. State Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Toledo Edison Co. v. RollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API