Tacchino v. State Department of Highways
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, C. J.:
The State commenced separate actions in eminent domain to condemn property owned by Andrea and Maria Tacchino. The actions were consolidated for trial and the jury returned its verdict for $396,402.28 in one case, and for $182,976.98 in the other. By this appeal the Tacchinos contend that the district court committed prejudicial error when, by pretrial order, it precluded them from offering certain evidence bearing upon fair market value. In our view the preclusive ruling should not have been made, and since it strikes the very heart of the cases, we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Department of Highways v. SchulhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Urban Renewal Agency of City of Reno v. IacomettiNevada Supreme Court · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fruit Growers Express Co. v. City of AlexandriaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- County of Clark v. AlperNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. Nevada Aggregates & Asphalt Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Elko v. ZillichNevada Supreme Court · 1984
- Sorenson v. State Ex Rel. Department of HighwaysNevada Supreme Court · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.