Legal Opinion

Toledo Edison Co. v. Roller

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1974No. 1083PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

The plaintiff Toledo Edison Company, the appellee herein, appropriated acreage for an electrical transmission line across the 92 acre farm owned by defendants Michael E. Eoller and Margaret J. Eoller, the appellants. A judgment was entered on a verdict of $15,000 and it is from this judgment that the appeal was taken. The first assignment of error states:

“The court erred in excluding all evidence as to the sales prices of comparable easements over the same property and over neighboring property, and in refusing to permit appellants’ expert to give his opinion of value of the Edison easement…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Curley v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
  5. Frederickson v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dorsey v. DonohooOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API