Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles M. McInteer
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 1, 2006No. 04-16167PublishedCited by 276 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:
This is a qui tam action brought in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama by a physician, the relator, against two physicians and several health care providers under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. The district court dismissed the relator’s complaint, and he now appeals. The questions lying at the heart of this appeal are whether the complaint’s allegations of fraud have been made with the “particularity” required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) and, if not, whether the district court abused its discretion in not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- University of South Alabama v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- John W. Dussouy, Jr. v. Gulf Coast Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States Ex Rel. Clausen v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- Christopher J. Weiland v. Palm Beach County Sheriff's OfficeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. IreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Davis v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. ConsolidatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Jacobs v. Tempur-Pedic International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Carlos Urquilla-Diaz v. Kaplan UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.