Legal Opinion

Baird v. Detroit Election Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1947No. Calendar No. 43,686PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We issued an order directing the defendant election commission to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not be issued directing the defendant commission to refrain from placing the designation “common pleas judge” under the names of G-eorge T. Cartwright and Emmanuel N. Karay as candidates for said office, on the ballots to be used at the biennial spring election in Detroit, April 7, 1947. Eeturn has been made and arguments heard in open court.

Plaintiffs are duly nominated candidates for the office of judge of the common pleas court of the city of Detroit, to be voted on at said election.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Fyfe v. Kent County ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. People v. Crucible Steel Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Murtha v. LindsayMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. United Insurance v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People Ex Rel. Wayne Prosecuting Attorney v. Society of Good NeighborsMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gardner v. Van Buren Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Gardner v. Van Buren Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API