Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gardner v. Van Buren Public Schools

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1994No. Docket Nos. 95531, 95532, 95536, (Calendar Nos. 11-13)Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBrickley, J.

While I agree with much of the analysis *53offered by the majority, I write separately to express my understanding of the proper interpretation of MCL 418.301(2); MSA 17.237(301)(2). It is my opinion that by amending MCL 418.301(2); MSA 17.237(301)(2) to demand that mental disability claimants establish "actual events of employment, not unfounded perceptions thereof,” the Legislature sought to create a standard of causation that incorporated greater substantive objectivity. Because the majority seems to leave intact much of the purely "subjective causal nexus” test created by this Court in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stowers v. WolodzkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Wyandotte Savings Bank v. State Banking CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API