Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. Viking Supply Corporation

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 3, 1966No. 2 CA-CIV 72PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellants (defendants below) appeal from a judgment entered in superior court, Pima county, Arizona, in favor of appellee (plaintiff below). In the spring of 1960, the City of Tucson awarded a contract for the installation of water mains to Gallagher. The contract, referred to as Contract I—1, specified, inter alia, that all cement asbestos pipe installed be Class 150 pipe of the following or equal:

Johns-Manville, .............“Ringtite”

Keasbey and Mattison Century, .......“Fluid-tite”

S. A. Eternit, .............“Selftite”

Viking, a pipe supplier, was familiar with, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Webb v. HardinArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Alfonso Linwood Carney v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  3. Nalbandian v. Byron Jackson Pumps, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Musgrave v. GithensArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Davidson v. WeeArizona Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Winchester Packaging, Incorporated v. Mobil Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Rochester MacHine Corp. v. Mulach Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Merrick v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Penelko, Inc. v. John Price Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API