Legal Opinion
Molthan v. Temple University
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 5, 1985No. 84-1220PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Acting Chief Judge.
Appellant, an associate professor at a university, brought suit under Title VII and Section 1983, claiming her denial of promotion was motivated by sex discrimination. In this appeal from a judgment for the university, she complains that the district judge improperly limited discovery and also decided her retaliation claim which she did not wish to include in the case. She further maintains that the district court erred in ruling that the university was not a state actor and in dismissing her federal civil rights claim on that ground. We conclude…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Donna Zahorik, Judith Long Laws, Antonia Glasse and Charlotte Farris v. Cornell UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Waiters v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Mary J. Riordan v. William L. Kempiners and Shirley RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Unger v. National Residents Matching ProgramCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Hankins v. Temple UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. Comm'n v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Bennie Bailey v. Northern Indiana Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.