Legal Opinion

Donna Zahorik, Judith Long Laws, Antonia Glasse and Charlotte Farris v. Cornell University

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 22, 1984No. 243, Docket 83-7450PublishedCited by 216 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTER, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs, four women formerly employed as Assistant Professors at defendant Cornell University (“Cornell”), commenced this action in June, 1980, alleging inter alia they were denied professorial tenure because of their gender in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII” or the “Act”). 1 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. They now appeal from Chief Judge Munson’s granting of Cornell’s motion for summary judgment and entry of a final judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) dismissing those claims, 579 F.Supp. 349. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs allege…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by216 opinions

  1. John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  2. Shelley Weinstock v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Nancy O'Mara Ezold, at No. 91-1780 v. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen, at No. 91-1741Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

211 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API