Legal Opinion
Mary J. Riordan v. William L. Kempiners and Shirley Randolph
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 8, 1987No. 86-1687PublishedCited by 247 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
Mary Riordan appeals from a judgment by the district court dismissing her consolidated complaints of sex discrimination. One complaint is based on section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, now 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and names as the defendants Shirley Randolph and William Kempiners. The other is based on the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)(1), and names only Kempiners as a defendant. The judge granted summary judgment for Kempiners on the section 1983 complaint. The section 1983 claim against Randolph was then tried to a jury, but at the close of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brandon v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- George Jones, Cross-Appellant v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Jacqueline Lewis v. City of Union City, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Carol Aman Jeanette Johnson v. Cort Furniture Rental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Ralph C. SHAGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN COMPANY and Asgrow Seed Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Anne Dey v. Colt Construction & Development CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.