Beaman v. Unger
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, James Beaman, appearing pro se, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that his constitutional rights were violated in certain respects in 2009 and 2010, while plaintiff was confined at Wyoming Correctional Facility. Defendants, all of whom at all relevant times were employed by DOCS at Wyoming, have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
BACKGROUND
According…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Chance v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Hathaway v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Morales v. FischerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Nelson v. DemingDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2015
- Moran v. LivingstonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Frank v. County of OntarioDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Mora v. HughesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.