Legal Opinion
Curran v. Kroll
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 13, 2012No. SC 18585PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The substitute plaintiff, Ryan P. Curran (plaintiff), 1 the successor administrator of the estate of Leeann Curran (decedent), brought this medical malpractice action against the defendants, Sherry L. Kroll, a physician, and the Medical Center of Northeast Connecticut, LLP, 2 claiming, inter alia, that Kroll had failed to warn the decedent adequately of certain risks associated with the use of birth control pills and the symptoms of those risks. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and rendered judgment accordingly. The plaintiff then appealed…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Macdermid, Inc. v. LeonettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Cammarota v. GuerreraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Procaccini v. Lawrence & Memorial Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Pellet v. Keller Williams Realty Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.