State v. Novembrino
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
STEIN, J.
Since 1961, when the United States Supreme Court decided Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684, 6 L.Ed.2d 1081, New Jersey and her sister states have been compelled by the federal constitution to exclude from the State’s case-in-ehief evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment. The so-called “exclusionary rule” has been applied in federal criminal cases since 1914 when the rule was first adopted to protect the rights secured by the fourth amendment.1 Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, 34 S.Ct. 341, 58 L.Ed. 652. Justice Day,…
2Cases cited119 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by333 opinions
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- State v. MarshallSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- State v. GeraldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
328 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.