Legal Opinion

Karnofsky v. Wells-Dickey Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1931No. 28,290PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

Action to recover money paid, upon rescission on the ground of fraud of the assignment of a mortgage by the defendant, the mortgagee, to the plaintiff. At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony the action waS dismissed on motion of the defendant. The plaintiff made a motion for a new trial upon the ground that the decision was not justified by the evidence; that it was contrary to law; and because of errors of law occurring at the trial. The motion was granted. The defendant appeals.

Neither the order granting the motion for a new trial nor the memorandum of the court appended stated that it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wood v. CullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  2. Halvorsen v. Moon & Kerr Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Cowley v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1868
  4. Fitger v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  5. Langan v. IversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Haugen v. International Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API