Smith v. Irwin
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
There are two suits involving the same questions of law, one brought by the father to recover damages for injury to his son, and the other brought by the son, in ¡the name of the father, to recover compensation for injury to himself. Smith, the defendant below, was a manufacturer in the city of Newark. Robert J. Irwin, the son, then seventeen years old, was injured August 4th, 1886, while working :a circular saw on the said defendant’s premises.
The question for consideration on the trial of the cause was, whether, under the evidence, the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Lynchburg Cotton Mills v. StanleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Coons v. Pritchard ex rel. PritchardSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Kerker ex rel. Kerker v. Bettendorf Metal Wheel Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Ludwig v. KirbyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Tittlebaum v. Progressive Paper Box Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.