Legal Opinion
Ludwig v. Kirby
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 13, 1951PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
13 N.J. Super. 116 (1951)
80 A.2d 239
CHARLES EDWARD LUDWIG, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, CHARLES E. LUDWIG, AND CHARLES E. LUDWIG, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
GEORGE KIRBY, FREDERICK BOHNE, RICHARD SYLSTRA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 22, 1951.
Decided April 13, 1951.
Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.
Mr. Maurice Levinthal argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Ward & Levinthal, attorneys).
Mr. George F. Lahey, Jr., argued the cause for the defendant-respondent George Kirby (Messrs. Lahey & Gockeler,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Forrester v. EckersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
- Hurst v. CobbDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1894
- Feir v. WeilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Smith v. IrwinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Graham v. GreenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- May Ex Rel. May v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Levis v. ZapolitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Bustelo v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Malloy v. Capitol BakeryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.