Legal Opinion

City of Lakewood v. Rees

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1937No. 26331PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

This court has heretofore considered the validity of transfers of funds received as water rentals to the general fund of a city. - The' question has been before the court in two cases, City of Cincinnati v. Roettinger, a Taxpayer, 105 Ohio St., 145, 137 N. E., 6, and Hartwig Realty Co. v. City of Cleveland, 128 Ohio St., 583, 192 N. E., 880. In those cases, the constitutional validity of Section 3959, General Code, was upheld and it was announced that that section oper-' ated as a valid limitation upon the uses and purposes for which revenues derived from municipally owned waterworks might be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartwig Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson's Island, Inc. v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. City of Cincinnati ex rel. Crotty v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. City of Niles v. Union Ice Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Himebaugh v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Brawley v. McNarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API