Legal Opinion
State v. Allen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 4, 1986No. 85-60CR; CA A36678PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The state appeals the trial court’s pretrial order dismissing a murder indictment. We reverse.
Defendant was arrested and charged with several robberies, burglaries and thefts. A plea agreement was negotiated between the prosecutor and defense counsel. In relevant part, it provided:
“Defendant will plead to:
(Robbery I, Theft I), ex con), 84-203CR; (Burg I, Theft I), ex-con) 84-205CR.
“D.A. will dismiss or will not file:
Burg I, Theft I, (Harvest Food); Burg I, Theft I, (Sun Save Auto) ex con; prob. rev. 83-407ACR.
“[Defendant will] meet w/investigating officers and confess all crimes committed in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ReinhartOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. WestonOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. StevensonOregon Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ManzellaOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. ManzellaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. EvesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. ManzellaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.