Legal Opinion

Porter v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 17, 1976No. C.D. 4641; Court No. 72-1-00129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain motorcycle gloves imported by plaintiff from Sweden and West Germany. The gloves were classified by the Customs officials as leather, seamed, unlined men’s gloves, not seamed wholly or in part by hand, valued over $20 per dozen pairs, under item 705.50 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). They were therefore assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff protests the classification, and claims that the motorcycle gloves were specially…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley's Orange BeverageCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Cadillac Marine & Boat Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1964
  3. Davis Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. American Astral Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Stonewall Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newman Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  2. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports2001
  3. Pacific Trail Sportswear v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API