Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Steinkamp

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1947No. 8740PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an action seeking determination that defendant is holding certain described real estate in trust for the sole beneEit of Fred J. Thompson.

The action was instituted by Emery O. Smith as guardian of the person and estate of Fred J. Thompson. After the commencement of the action, Thompson died and his wife, Alice S. Thompson, as administratrix, was substituted as party plaintiff.

The complaint alleges in substance that Thompson gave to defendant the sum of $2,000 to hold in trust for him; that at his request and with the funds so advanced by him to her, defendant purchased for him the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Sprague v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Katz v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Dinneen v. YoungerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Kausky v. KostenWashington Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Crenshaw v. CrenshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re the Estate of HarmonMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Platts v. PlattsMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. SharbonoMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hilliard v. HilliardMontana Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API