Callie v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AISO, J.
All three consolidated cases raise the common issue of legality of playing the game, “panguingue,” for money, checks, credits, or other things of value in public card clubs in the unincorporated territory of Los Angeles County.
In Nos. 32752 and 32753, the County of Los Angeles and the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County appeal from judgments, respectively entered June 14, 1967, which mandated the board of supervisors to remove the condition placed on Callie’s and Dicker’s respective card club licenses precluding the playing of or the permitting of the playing of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Bruce v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
- In re AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Cal-Dak Co. v. Sav-On Drugs, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Alternatives for California Women, Inc. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.