Portland v. Investment Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Calvin U. Gantenbein, Judge. This is a proceeding by the city of Portland to establish a street.. From a judgment of the circuit court dismissing an appeal by the Investment Company for an assessment of benefits and damages, it appeals. Respondent, city of Portland, now moves to dismiss appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Eakin.
By ordinance No. 21,890 of Portland, adopting the report of the viewers in the matter of the proposed opening, laying out and establishing of Simpson Street, between the east line of West Piedmont and the west line of Commercial streets, an assessment is made of the benefits • and damages set forth in the report, passed August 24, and approved August 29, 1910. Defendant, who is the owner of lots affected by the assessment, appealed from such ordinance to the circuit court, and on motion of plaintiff the appeal was dismissed, for the reason that it was not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. JuryOregon Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. v. FieldsOregon Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Equi v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Oregon State Grange v. McKayOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Dimick v. LatouretteOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- McKenney v. BuolOregon Supreme Court · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.