Matter of Barkley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Respondent initially argues that the court erred when it denied respondent’s motion to strike the testimony of Dariyan and Ms. Roach as to statements Lester Whittington made to Dariyan concerning the noise in the hallway and Dariyan’s punishment for failing to stop it. We reject respondent’s contention that Dariyan’s and Ms. Roach’s testimony as to the statements was hearsay and excludable, since the testimony was not admitted to prove the truth of the matter contained in the statements but rather to show that the statements were made and Dariyan’s resulting state of mind.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Wilson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. WycheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Cook v. CookCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re J.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Matter of BullaboughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Matter of MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- In Re FairclothCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- In re: C.M.P., C.Q.M.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.