In re: C.M.P., C.Q.M.P.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, Judge.
*648Where the trial court did not err in denying respondent's motion for a continuance or in concluding grounds existed to terminate respondent's parental rights, we affirm.
Respondent is the mother of C.M.P. ("Charlene"), C.Q.M.P. ("Charles"), and J.A.C. ("Jackson"),1 and Mr. P. is the father *855of Charlene and Charles. Respondent and Mr. P have a history with the Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services, Youth and Family Services ("YFS") dating back to 2011 due to issues of domestic violence and inappropriate discipline. YFS most recently became involved with the family on 13…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Matter of BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- In Re YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- In Re ShepardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- In re S.N.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Exec. Off. Park of Durham Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- Exec. Off. Park of Durham Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- In re J.A.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
- In re J.D.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- In re J.E.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.