Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 13, 1967PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.

There is no merit in the assignments of error relating to the admission and exclusion of testimony concerning the extent of the permission granted by Benson to Perdue for the use by Perdue of Benson’s automobile.

The questions addressed to the plaintiff’s witness, to which objections were sustained, were designed to elicit from the witness what statements she héard, or did not hear, Benson and Perdue *188make to each other concerning the purpose for which Perdue was permitted to use the automobile and when he was to return it. For example, Mrs. Perdue, if permitted to answer the question, would…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Hawley v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Johnson Sons, Inc. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Bailey Ex Rel. First National Bank of Catawba County, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Corruthers v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Koury v. FolloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API