Hicks v. . Greene County
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtCoknor, J.
This appeal was submitted to this Court without oral argument, under Eule 10, 192 N. O., p. 844. It has been considered only on tbe record and on tbe printed briefs of counsel for both parties.
It is apparent from a reading of the statement of facts agreed upori and submitted to the court below, and of the briefs filed in this Court, that there is no question in difference between the parties hereto, which might be the subject of a civil action for the determination of their respective rights on the facts agreed. C. S., 626. There is no real controversy between the parties, requiring a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burton v. Durham Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- McKethan v. . RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Farthing v. CarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Farthing v. . CarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- Washington Beauty College, Inc. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Town of Tryon v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Acme Finance Co. v. HuseWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- County Board of Education for Unorganized Territory v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Board of Health v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.