Legal Opinion

Maricopa County v. Dann

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1988No. CV-88-0230-SA, CV-88-0250-SAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

This matter arises out of two petitions for special action filed by the Board of Supervisors of Maricopa County. Petitioners request this court to exercise our original jurisdiction under Article VI, § 5 of the Arizona Constitution to review the actions of the respondent Presiding Judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court. The petitioners challenge the presiding judge’s refusal to follow county policies in filling personnel positions and the judge’s actions in ordering members of the board to appear at hearings conducted by him.

The facts necessary for the resolution of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Powers v. IsleyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mann v. County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Broomfield v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Birdsall v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Roylston v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riley, Hoggatt & Suagee, P.C. v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ridenour v. SchwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Clark v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Maricopa County v. TinneyArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Riley, Hoggatt & Suagee, P.C. v. EnglishArizona Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API