Legal Opinion

Riley, Hoggatt & Suagee, P.C. v. English

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1993No. CV-92-0355-PRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*12AMENDED OPINION

Memorandum Decision of the Court of Appeals, Division Two, filed July 9, 1992, Vacated

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

The superior court dismissed a claim for legal fees and costs submitted by Riley, Hoggatt & Suagee, P.C. (“Plaintiff’), finding that the claim failed as a matter of law. We granted review because the issue has statewide importance. Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23(c)(4). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. VI, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24, and Ariz. R.Civ.App.P. 23.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In sentencing a criminal defendant who lived in Willcox, a Cochise County…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Hurles v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Dunn v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Deddens v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Comerica Bank v. MAHMOODICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Bogue v. Better-Bilt Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. Great American Mortgage, Inc. v. Statewide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API