Legal Opinion

Maricopa County v. Tinney

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1995No. CV-95-0070-SAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZLAKET, Justice.

The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, battling a 67 million dollar deficit, imposed a county-wide “hiring freeze” on December 14, 1994. Exemptions from this freeze required a showing of individual necessity for each, position to be filled with a new employee.

Two weeks following enactment of this policy, the Presiding Judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court, C. Kimball Rose, submitted requisition forms for several new employees, including a replacement bailiff for Judge Daniel A. Barker. Judge Barker’s bailiff was planning to retire in January. Judge Rose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Broomfield v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Maricopa County v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API