Legal Opinion
Ridenour v. Schwartz
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1994No. CV-94-0136-SAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.
STATEMENT OP THE CASE
On March 28, 1994, the presiding judge of the Maricopa County Superior Court issued an administrative order restricting public access to the court buildings after 3:00 p.m. For the remainder of the fiscal year, those persons not in the court buildings prior to 3:00 p.m. would be denied access to observe trials or other court proceedings until the next court day. In this special action, we are asked to determine whether this administrative order denied defendant his constitutional right to a public trial or is otherwise impermissible. We…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Allied Daily Newspapers v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. LoudenOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Bd. of Com'rs, Weld Co. v. 19th Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Board of County Commissioners v. Nineteenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. LoudenOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- KPNX-TV Channel 12 v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.