Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Bradley

California Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1889No. 11996PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vancliee, C. —

This is an action to foreclose a street-assessment lien for $707, upon lot No. 17,southeast corner of Union and Polk streets, San Francisco-, for grading Union Street from Larkin Street to the westerly line of Franklin Street by order of the board of supervisors made August. 13, 1877. The work of grading was done by J. S. Dyer under contract dated October 4, 1877, and was commenced on or about the ninth day of October following, and completed prior to May 2.6, 1880; and the assessment therefor was levied on the twenty-seventh day of May, 1880. The plaintiff sued as the assignee…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Quinn v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Hope v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Scott v. DyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kellerman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Burk v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Spaulding v. WessonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Myers v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API