Myers v. City of Oceanside
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a- judgment of the Superior Court of San Dieg-o County, and from an order denying a new trial. N. H. Conklin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
This is an action to quiet title to one-half of a block of land in the city of Oceanside, county of San Diego, claimed by the defendant to have been dedicated as a public park by one Andrew J. Myers, the original owner by United States patent, and predecessor in title to the plaintiffs.
Judgment was for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals from the judgment and an order of the superior court denying its motion for a new trial.
The findings of the court were affirmative of the allegations of the complaint, which was in the usual form of a complaint to quiet title. The case made by the city is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Archer v. Salinas CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Town of San Leandro v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Prescott v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Nathan v. DierssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Davidow v. GriswoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Garvin County v. Lindsay Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Moore v. HoarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Baldwin v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.