Hope v. Barnett
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
Action in ejectment, and for damages for detention of real estate and tearing down and removal of a fence. Answer denying all of the material allegations of the complaint, and alleging further, that the defendant Barnett was at the time of the alleged ouster overseer of the road district in which the real estate was situate; that the premises mentioned in the complaint were a public highway; that the fence mentioned was erected by the plaintiff, and by her permitted to stand in, and was an obstruction to, a certain public highway; that said defendant, as such overseer, notified plaintiff to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Harding & Loftin v. JasperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Summers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Culbertson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Bolger v. FossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schwerdtle v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Niles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Huffman v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Spaulding v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Smithers v. FitchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.