Legal Opinion
Lenox Hill Hospital v. Shalala
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 14, 2000No. Civil Action 99-CV03087SSHPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendant’s motion to dismiss, plaintiffs’ opposition, and defendant’s reply thereto. Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, the Court grants defendant’s motion. Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of'motions under Rule 12 or 56, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Summers v. Department of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1079-80 (D.C.Cir.1998), the Court sets forth its reasoning.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Lenox Hill Hospital (“Lenox Hill”) and Kaleida Health d/b/a Buffalo General Hospital (“Buffalo…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Victor Herbert v. National Academy of SciencesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Terry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Douglass v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Bloom v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- DISTRICT HOSP. PARTNERS, LP v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Waked Fares v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.