Legal Opinion
Waked Fares v. Smith
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 7, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1730PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Abdul Mohamed Waked Fares, Mohamed Abdo Waked Darwich, Lucia Touzard Romo, and Groupo Wisa, S.A., have been designated as Specially Designated Narcotics Traffickers by Defendants pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act (“Kingpin Act”), 21 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq. In this action, they bring claims pursuant to the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) for Defendants’ alleged failure to provide them with sufficient post-designation notice regarding the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Aracely v. NielsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Abdul Waked Fares v. John SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Zaccari v. Apprio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Depu v. Yahoo! Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Basengezi v. GackiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.