Legal Opinion

Yelton v. . McKinney

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

The primary question in dispute between the parties was whether the note was intended to be included in the deliberation of the arbitrators and thereafter merged in the written award. There was no written submission, but the award recites that the matters in controversy were “concerning the Elmore Hosiery Mill of Lawndale, N. C.,” nor does the award undertake in express terms to declare the relationship of the parties to the note in controversy or undertake to establish any liability by virtue thereof. This Court has heretofore declared that “the award, both in substance and in form, must…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Brown v. . SheetsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Bland v. . FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Farmer v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Geiger v. . CaldwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Young v. New York Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API