Legal Opinion

Hall v. Wisconsin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 15, 1880No. 44PublishedCited by 127 opinions

Error to the Supreine Court of the State of Wisconsin. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swayne

This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin. The case we are called on to consider is thus disclosed in. the record: —

By an act of the legislature, entitled “ An Act to provide for' a geological, mineralogical, and’ agricultural survey of the State,” approved March 8, 1857, James Hall, of the State of New York, the plaintiff in error, and Ezra Carr and Edward Daniels, of Wisconsin, were appointed “commissioners” to make the survey. Their duties were specifically defined, and were all of a scientific character.

They were required-to distribute the functions of their work by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. Newton v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. United States v. MauriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1823

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Auffmordt v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API