State v. Higdon
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PARRISH, Chief Judge.
James H. Higdon (defendant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of the offenses of forcible sodomy, § 566.060,1 and forcible rape, § 566.030. Following his convictions, defendant filed a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An amended motion was filed and, after evi-dentiary hearing, denied. Defendant appeals the convictions in his criminal case (No. 17051) and the order denying his amended Rule 29.15 motion (No. 17815). The appeals were consolidated as required by Rule 29.15(l). This court affirms.
Defendant met C.H. the evening of July 29, 1988, at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. AntwineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. BannisterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. SinovichSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. McGeheeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005