Legal Opinion
Peyton v. Peyton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 10, 1923No. 14752PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
1. Wliere an attachment was sued out by Tom Peyton Jr. against Tom Peyton Sr., and the attachment bond was executed by the fórmelas principal and P. T. Reynolds as security, but the name of the latter was inadvertently written also in the body of the bond as the obligee, where the name of the defendant in attachment should have appeared, it was not error for the court to allow the name of P. T. Reynolds in the body of the bond to be stricken and the name of the defendant Tom Peyton Sr. substituted therefor as the obligee, by amendment, the security consenting thereto. Civil Code (1910), §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gelders v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Barley v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Sherman v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Smith v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Lee v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Draper Canning Co. v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Whitley v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- St. Monica's Hospital v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Edmonds Shoe Co. v. ColsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930