Edmonds Shoe Co. v. Colson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Hnder the facts of this ease the court properly allowed the claim *284bond amended, the bondsman being in court and consenting thereto. See Civil Code (1910), § 5707; Lee v. Mills, 69 Ga. 740 (1); Decatur County Bank v. Thomason, 31 Ga. App. 299 (1) (120 S. E. 642); Peyton v. Peyton, 31 Ga. App. 470 (1) (120 S. E. 689), and cases cited.
The court properly dismissed the levy. Section 6022 of the Civil Code of 1910 is as follows: “All executions must follow the judgment from which.they issued, and describe the parties thereto as described in such judgment.” The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ferry & Co. v. Mattox & TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Ells v. BoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Decatur County Bank v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Lee v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Peyton v. PeytonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923