Legal Opinion

Lee v. Mills

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.. [This was a claim case. It was appealed to a jury in the justice’s court, and after verdict there a certiorari was applied for. On the trial in the justice’s court, plaintiff moved to dismiss the claim, because the bond given by-claimant was “ no damage bond, ” and because there was no security on the same. The bond was as follows :

“Georgia — Puce County.

Know all men by these presents that we, Charles G. Mills, as principal, and---as security, are held and bound unto J. J. Lee, in the sum of eighty dollars, for the payment of which we bind ourselves, our heirs and assigns.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Decatur County Bank v. ThomasonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Gordon v. Commercial Auto Loan Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Peyton v. PeytonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Sabin-Robbins Paper Company v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Edmonds Shoe Co. v. ColsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API