Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 2, 1925No. 15866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The affidavit required under section 5184 of the Civil Code (1910) in a petition for certiorari is not, when made by the at- • torney for the petitioner, invalid because the attorney makes affidavit that he himself verily believes that he, the attorney, has good cause for certiorari. An affidavit so made complies with the provisions of section 5184 of the Civil Code (1910). See, in this connection, Morrison v. Hilburn, 126 Ga. 114 (1) (54 S. E. 938).

2. A certificate to a petition for certiorari made by the judge whose judgment is the subject matter of complaint that “the petitioner for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Hilburn & PooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Stovall & Brother v. JoinerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  3. Hirsch & Co. v. Lumbermen's Supply & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Standard Gas Products Co. v. VismorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Janes v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris Plan Bank of Georgia v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Coleman v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Rigdon v. Roberts Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Bennett v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API