Legal Opinion

Brooks v. . Woodruff

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 11, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was a proceeding of protest under the entry laws, C.S. 7557; and, from a judgment in favor of protestant, the enterer, or claimant, appealed. Brooks made entry to certain lands, under C.S. 7554, alleging the same to be vacant or unappropriated. Woodruff filed his protest, under C.S. 7557, claiming title to the land covered by the entry under a prior grant from the State. On the trial the rights of the parties were made to depend upon the true location of the lines and boundaries of Woodruff's grant. The case was heard on an agreed statement of facts, and his Honor, by consent, acting as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Doe on Dem. of Tatem v. PaineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1825
  3. Yadkin Lumber Co. v. BernhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Geddie v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Tinsley v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cook v. Town of MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Carrow v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Hanes v. . Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Hanes v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Edwards v. . BenbowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API