Tinsley v. City of Winston-Salem
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injury. The defendant was paving North Trade Street. In the middle of the street a ditch had been cut for a water and sewer line, and on each side at right angles with it were several ditches through which the main line was to be connected with dwellings on the adjacent property. The plaintiff lived on the west side of the street. She offered evidence tending to show that for fifteen or twenty years she had used a sidewalk or pathway there in going from and returning to her home. She used it every day; it was the only way she had. The lateral…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hester v. Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Bailey v. . WinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Rollins v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Russell v. . MonroeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Sehorn v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Rountree v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Michaux v. . Rocky MountSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Broadaway v. King-Hunter, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Brooks v. . WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.