Legal Opinion
Ritter v. Franklin
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 30, 1942No. Civ. No. 2964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The following opinion was prepared by the Honorable Franklin G. West, Justice pro tern., and is adopted as the opinion of the court.
Respondent was the owner of a street improvement bond issued February 3, 1925, under the Street Improvement Act of 1911. (Stats. 1911, p. 730; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 8199.) She instituted an action to foreclose said bond in the Superior Court of San Bernardino County pursuant to the provisions of section 76a of said act. The said bond was a lien upon certain property in the city of San Bernardino, a portion of which property was owned by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Bradley Co. v. RidgewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Irvine v. BossenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Paules v. Elbert, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1955